Scaling the Cliffs of Insanity (aka using Ansible from a Windows controller)

Dread Pirate Roberts and Princess Buttercup, out for a morning stroll

This post is just record-keeping for me to remember why I abandoned Ansible on Windows a few months back.

Seriously, here be dragons

Here’s what I did to enable me to use Ansible for automation

  • Since I’m using a Windows box as my primary desktop for now, I wanted to see if I could avoid running a Linux VM just to manage other *NIX boxes
  • I thought I should be able to get away with using the Git for Windows environment rather than the full Cygwin environment that Jeff Geerling documents here (spoiler alert: I couldn’t, but it’s instructive to document how far I got and where it broke down)

Install and troubleshoot Ansible on Git for Windows

  • I followed installation instructions from step (3) (including using those legacy versions of PyYAML and Jinja2)
  • I skipped step (6) since I already had SSH keys
  • I ran ansible –version, and saw errors like:
     $ ansible --version
     Traceback (most recent call last):
       File "C:/Users/Mike/code/ansible/bin/ansible", line 46, in <module>
        from ansible.utils.display import Display
       File "C:\Users\Mike\code\ansible\lib\ansible\utils\", line 21, in <module>
        import fcntl
     ImportError: No module named 'fcntl'
  • Tried resolving that dependency via
  • This just led to the following (which seemed a hint that I might encounter many such issues, not worth it):
     $ ansible --version
     Traceback (most recent call last):
       File "C:/Users/Mike/code/ansible/bin/ansible", line 46, in <module>
        from ansible.utils.display import Display
       File "C:\Users\Mike\code\ansible\lib\ansible\utils\", line 33, in <module>
        from termios import TIOCGWINSZ
     ImportError: No module named 'termios'
  • Gave in, uninstalled Python 3.5.1 and jumped back to latest Python 2.x (2.7.1)
  • Still couldn’t get past that error, so I gave up and went to Cygwin

Install and troubleshoot Ansible on Cygwin64

Then I found this article, followed a combo of the top answer:

  • apt-cyg remove python-cryptography
  • git clone –depth 1 git://
  • apt-cyg install git python-{jinja2,six,yaml}
  • wget && install apt-cyg /bin
  • That results in this output:
     $ ansible --version
     ansible 2.2.0 (devel 37737ca6c1) last updated 2016/05/11 14:27:18 (GMT -700)
       lib/ansible/modules/core:  not found - use git submodule update --init lib/ansible/modules/core
       lib/ansible/modules/extras:  not found - use git submodule update --init lib/ansible/modules/extras
       config file =
       configured module search path = ['/opt/ansible/library']
  • Then running this command from within the local ansible repo (e.g. from /opt/ansible) gets the basic modules you’ll need to get started (e.g. the “ping” module for testing)
    git submodule update –init –recursive
  • Then I decided to test ansible’s ability to connect to the target host based on the command recommended in Ansible’s installation docs:
     $ ansible all -m ping --ask-pass
     SSH password: | FAILED! => {
        "failed": true,
        "msg": "to use the 'ssh' connection type with passwords, you must install the sshpass program"
  • OK, let’s get sshpass installed on my control device [Windows box] so that we can quickly bootstrap the SSH keys to the target…
  • Since sshpass isn’t an available package in Cygwin package directory, the only way to get sshpass is to install it from source
    •  NOTE: I discovered this the hard way, after trying every trick I could think of to make all this work without having to deal with a C compiler
  • Found this article for OS X users and followed it in my Windows environment (NOTE: I had to install the “make” and “gcccore” packages from Cygwin setup – and then having to re-run apt-cyg remove python-cryptography from the Cygwin terminal again because it gets automatically reinstalled by Cygwin setup)
  • This time when running the command I get a different error – which means I must’ve got sshpass stuffed in the right location:
     $ ansible all -m ping --ask-pass
     SSH password: | FAILED! => {
        "failed": true,
        "msg": "Using a SSH password instead of a key is not possible because Host Key checking is enabled and sshpass does not support this.  Please add this host's fingerprint to your known_hosts file to manage this host."
  • I’m guessing this means I need to obtain the target host’s SSH public key (and not that the target host refused to connect because it didn’t trust the control host).  So then I had to harvest the target host’s fingerprint
     $ ssh -o StrictHostKeyChecking=ask -l mike
     The authenticity of host ' (' can't be established.
     ECDSA key fingerprint is SHA256:RqBcq8aCAgohFeiTlPeYd8hLDfTz1A25ZPlzyxlDrqI.
     Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
     Warning: Permanently added '' (ECDSA) to the list of known hosts.
     mike@'s password:
  • This time around when running the ping command I saw this error:
     $ ansible all -m ping --ask-pass
     SSH password: | UNREACHABLE! => {
        "changed": false,
        "msg": "Authentication failure.",
        "unreachable": true
  • I finally got the bright idea to poke around the target’s log files and see if there were any clues – sure enough, /var/log/auth.log made it clear enough to me:
     Invalid user Mike from
     input_userauth_request: invalid user Mike [preauth]
      pam_unix(sshd:auth): check pass; user unknown
      pam_unix(sshd:auth): authentication failure...
      Failed password for invalid user Mike from port 58665 ssh2
      Connection closed by [preauth]
  • (Boy do I hate *NIX case-sensitivity at times like this – my Windows username on the control device is “Mike” and the Linux username on the target is “mike”)
  • Tried this same command but adding the root user (ansible all -m ping –user root –ask-pass) but kept getting the same error back, and saw /var/log/auth.log reported “Failed password for root from”)
  • Re-ran su root in bash on the target just to make sure I wasn’t forgetting the password (I wasn’t)
  • Tried a basic ssh connection with that same password (to eliminate other variables):
     $ ssh root@
     root@'s password:
     Permission denied, please try again.
     root@'s password:
     Permission denied, please try again.
     root@'s password:
     Permission denied (publickey,password).
  • Tried the same thing with my “mike” user, success:
     $ ssh mike@
     mike@'s password:
     The programs included with the Debian GNU/Linux system are free software;
     the exact distribution terms for each program are described in the
     individual files in /usr/share/doc/*/copyright.
     Debian GNU/Linux comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY, to the extent
     permitted by applicable law.
     Last login: Sat May 14 16:10:05 2016 from
  • One more try with the ansible/SSH/password approach:
     $ ansible all -m ping --user mike --ask-pass
     SSH password: | UNREACHABLE! => {
        "changed": false,
        "msg": "Failed to connect to the host via ssh.",
        "unreachable": true
  • So close!!  Search led to this possibility, so I re-ran with -vvvv param to get this:
     $ ansible all -m ping --user mike --ask-pass -vvvv
     No config file found; using defaults
     SSH password:
     Loaded callback minimal of type stdout, v2.0
     <> SSH: EXEC sshpass -d44 ssh -C -vvv -o ControlMaster=auto -o ControlPersist=60s -o User=mike -o ConnectTimeout=10 -o ControlPath=/home/Mike/.ansible/cp/ansible-ssh-%h-%p-%r '/bin/sh -c '"'"'( umask 77 && mkdir -p "` echo $HOME/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1463273031.8-128175022355609 `" && echo "` echo $HOME/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1463273031.8-128175022355609 `" )'"'"''
     <> PUT /tmp/tmp948_ec TO /home/mike/.ansible/tmp/ansible-tmp-1463273031.8-128175022355609/ping
     <> SSH: EXEC sshpass -d44 sftp -b - -C -vvv -o ControlMaster=auto -o ControlPersist=60s -o User=mike -o ConnectTimeout=10 -o ControlPath=/home/Mike/.ansible/cp/ansible-ssh-%h-%p-%r '[]' | UNREACHABLE! => {
        "changed": false,
        "msg": "SSH Error: data could not be sent to the remote host. Make sure this host can be reached over ssh",
        "unreachable": true
  • I can definitely see the ansible-tmp-1463273031.8-128175022355609 file under ~/.ansible/tmp on the target system, so Ansible is getting authenticated and can run the initial shell commands
  • But I’m not seeing the /ping file under that directory, and I’m wondering if there’s something preventing sftp from connecting to the target host (since that’s the final command being run just before I get back the error). The “sftp” program is available on the controller though.
  • Digging around in Wireshark, I can see the SSHv2 traffic between controller and target, but after the initial key exchange I see exactly 3 encrypted packets sent from the controller (and encrypted responses from the target), and then no further communication between the two thereafter.  The only other activity I see on either system that’s unexplained is the target device ARP’ing for the local router three times, once every second, after the SSH traffic dies off
  • After the first two initial successes in getting the tmp files pushed via ssh, I’ve since only had failures “Failed to connect to the host via ssh.”  Using ProcExp.exe to verify that there is actual network traffic being sent to the target’s IP, and using Wireshark to get some idea what’s getting through and what’s not (but Wireshark is acting up and no longer showing me traffic from controller to target, only target to controller responses, so it’s getting a little nuts at this point)
  • I’ve added “PTR” records to the hosts files on both the controller and the target to resolve the IP address for each other to a defined name, but I’m still getting “failed to connect…” (even though I can confirm that the tools are using the newly-registered name, since I even tried substituting the falsified name in the ansible_hosts file for the previously-used IP address)
  • I tried the advice from here to switch to SCP if SFTP might not be working, but that didn’t help (so I emptied out the .ansible.cfg file again)
  • I don’t know where to look for log files to see exactly what errors are occurring locally, so I’m pretty much stumped at this point
  • !!!!!! I pushed my ssh key to the target host, and the very next run of ansible all -m ping succeeded!!!! 😦
  • CONCLUSION: ssh-pass doesn’t seem compatible with the Windows setup I’ve been using all weekend
  • EPILOGUE: “Failed to connect…” error is back again when running ansible from Windows – I can see successful auth in the target’s /var/log/auth.log, but even -m ping fails (e.g. ansible all -m ping -u root)

Other References

Simplifying Vagrant-based testing: unsolved (I’m just calling it out to the universe)

I’m doing some pretty mind-numbing testing using Vagrant (yes, on Windows 10 – I like the challenge, apparently!), to make sure that I’m getting the results from changes I’m making to Ansible scripts.  Currently I’m testing the implementation of Ansible Vault, which means at each step of testing I:

  1. Vagrant destroy whatever box I just worked on
    • Which half the time means Vagrant and Virtualbox get out of sync, and I need to delete files and just vagrant init)
  2. Vagrant up
    • If I just init’d a new box, then I have to go into the Vagrantfile to uncomment then edit the config.vm.synced_folder setting, so that it removes the rsync dependency (setting it to config.vm.synced_folder “.”, “/vagrant”, disabled:true) – otherwise, vagrant up halts when it can’t find an rsync executable
  3. Mount the VM in Virtualbox Manager – Machine, Add…, find the .vbox file), then  launch the VM from VBox Mgr, login as vagrant, and edit the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file to set all instances of PasswordAuthentication to “yes”
  4. Reboot the VM
  5. Vagrant up
  6. Run ssh-keygen -f “/home/mike/.ssh/known_hosts” -R []:2222 to clear out the previously-trusted host SSH key
  7. Run ssh-copy-id vagrant@ -p 2222 to add my user’s SSH public key to the remote system (to enable Ansible to run over SSH)

I haven’t had time yet to start researching how to troubleshoot/automate each of these steps, but which I’ll eventually have to conquer so that I’m not re-learning the manual steps every time I return to volunteering a little spare time to this infrastructure project.

Why doesn’t chmod under Bash on Ubuntu on Windows 10 actually “take”?

I’m continuing to beat my head against a wall, attempting to test a very simple configuration change to an Ansible playbook I wrote, so that I can verify if my understanding of the use of Ansible vault is correct.

The latest problem?  Unix permissions.

Now that I’ve got SSH communications working between by Bash shell (Ubuntu on Windows 10, aka WSL), I’ve implemented changes to the playbook’s files including creating a .vault_pass.txt file under the Bash shell, and encrypting a vault.yml file using the password contained in the .vault_pass.txt.

When I run ansible-playbook role.yml –vault-password-file .vault_pass.txt, it complains of the following:

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ansible-playbook role.yml --vault-password-file .vault_pass.txt
ERROR! Problem running vault password script / m n t / c / U s e r s / M i k e / c o d e / C o p y - a n s i b l e - r o l e - u n a t t e n d e d - u p g r a d e s / . v a u l t _ p a s s . t x t ([Errno 8] Exec format error). If this is not a script, remove the executable bit from the file.

No problem, I’ve got this.  Just gotta run chmod 600 (or similarly, to remove the execute bit for my user) on the .vault_pass.txt file.  [For comparison, I just tried this on the same configuration under Ubuntu – which is having a different blocking issue at present, but not related to file permissions – and the command took immedateily.]  Hah, you should be so lucky:

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ls -la .vault_pass.txt
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Sep 26 18:38 .vault_pass.txt
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ chmod 600 .vault_pass.txt
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ls -la .vault_pass.txt
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Sep 26 18:38 .vault_pass.txt
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ whoami
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ sudo chmod 600 .vault_pass.txt
[sudo] password for mike:
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ls -la .vault_pass.txt
-rwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Sep 26 18:38 .vault_pass.txt

Yes, I get that the file is owned by root, and I’m running as mike – so why doesn’t it make a difference when I run sudo chmod?  Is this a problem with files owned by root?  Is this a problem with chmod?  Is this a problem with WSL/Bash?

Lightbulb moment

I went hunting for such issues in the Microsoft repo for the Bash On Windows project, and found this issue & comment:

So I figured I re-examine the situation.  All my files under the ~/code folder are owned by root – even . and .., which is odd…

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code$ ls -la
total 68
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 0 Sep 26 10:51 .
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 0 Aug 16 17:00 ..
drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 0 Aug 16 16:28 ansible-role-unattended-upgrades

Then I looked at my home folder and – d’oh!

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~$ ls -la
total 24
drwxr-xr-x 2 mike mike 0 Sep 26 18:37 .
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 31 1969 ..
-rw------- 1 mike mike 2452 Aug 16 22:48 .bash_history
-rw-r--r-- 1 mike mike 220 Aug 5 10:06 .bash_logout
-rw-r--r-- 1 mike mike 3637 Aug 5 10:06 .bashrc
lrwxrwxrwx 1 mike mike 22 Aug 16 12:58 code -> /mnt/c/Users/Mike/code


Now I remember: when I first sat down with this Bash On Ubuntu on Windows setup, I figured I’d save myself some trouble by using the exact same files in all my local repos – why bother duplicating the repos between Windows and Bash on Ubuntu?  So I symlinked a mount of the /code folder from my Windows user profile…and left myself a nice little landmine, it seems.

Rather than struggle with cacls.exe and try to find some magic combination that results in non-executable permissions on that file through the WSL translation layer (if at all), I just cloned the repo to a different folder (local to the Bash/Ubuntu/Win10 environment) and retried, with trivial success.

Simple troubleshooting the usual SSH error from Ansible

After the struggles I’ve had over the last couple of days, it’s strangely reassuring to stumble on a problem I’ve actually *seen* before, and recently.  Firsthand even.

I’ve fresh-built a Debian 8.5.2 VM in Virtualbox via Vagrant.  Then I setup an Ansible inventory file to point to the box’s current vagrant ssh-config settings.  Then fired off the tried-and-true ansible connectivity test, ansible all -u vagrant -m ping.  Here’s the response: | UNREACHABLE! => {
    "changed": false,
    "msg": "ERROR!  SSH encountered an unknown error during the connection.  We recommend you re-run the command using -vvvv, which will enable SSH debugging output to help diagnose the issue",
    "unreachable": true

Running the same command with -vvvv parameter results in a garbage heap of unformatted/concatenated debug screed, which ends with:

debug1: No more authentication methods to try.\r\nPermission denied (publickey,password).\r\n"

Simple Solution

As I’ve documented to myself already elsewhere, I need to run the following two commands:

ssh-keygen -t rsa

ssh-copy-id -p 2222 vagrant@

Bingo!  Nice to get an easy win.

Troubleshooting another SSH blocker (networking?) in debian/jessie64

Since I ran into another wall with trying to use Ansible Vault under Bash on Ubuntu on Windows10 (this time, chmod wouldn’t change the permissions on the .vault_pass.txt file from 755 to 600 – or any other permissions set for that matter), I went back to my Linux-based setup to try out the Ansible Vault solution I’d devised.

Here, I ended up unable to communicate with the VM using Ansible because SSH from Ubuntu to the Debian8 box had an incompatibility – to wit, when I ran ssh vagrant@ -p 2222, the command eventually timed out with the error “ssh_exchange_identification: read: Connection reset by peer”.

This is yet another piece of evidence that someone very recently (I believe between the 8.5.2 and the 8.6.0 versions of the box on Atlas) made breaking changes to the OpenSSH and/or OpenSSL configuration of the box.  One change I’ve figured out is they disabled PasswordAuthentication in the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file.

This problem?  Looks like (based on my read of articles like this one) the ssh client and server can’t agree on some cryptographic parameter.  Fun.  Cause there’s only about a million combinations of these parameters to play with.

[I also pursued ideas like the solution to this report, but currently the Debian8 box’s /etc/hosts.deny is still empty of uncommented entries.  Or the “is sshd running” idea from this report, but /var/log/auth.log definitely includes “[date] jessie sshd[366]: Server listening on port 22”.]

OK, so what’s the fastest way to isolate the set of parameters  that are being offered and demanded between the client and server?

Running the ssh client with -vvv parameter doesn’t help much – it enumerates the “key_load_public” attempts (rsa, rsa-cert, dsa, dsa-cert, ecdsa, ecdsa-cert, ed25519, ed25519-cert), then “Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0” and the SSH version “Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.2ps Ubuntu-4ubuntu2.1”, then fires off the “connection reset by peer” error again.  Dpkg -l reports that openssh-client is “1:7.2ps-4ubuntu2.1”.

What’s the server’s version of OpenSSH?  According to dpkg -l, it’s “1;6.7p1-5+deb8u3.  Is that right – 1.6.7?  And if so, how do I find out if there’s a cryptographic configuration incompatibility between 1.7.2 and 1.6.7?  [Certainly I can see that we have no such “connection reset by peer” issue between my Win10 Bash on Ubuntu shell, running 1.6.6p1 of openssh-client and the Debian8 box’s 1.6.7p1, so cryptographic compatibility between 1.6.6 and 1.6.7 is a reasonable assumption.]  Or better, is it possible to upgrade the Debian8 box’s openssh-server to something later than 1.6.7 – preferably (but not exclusively) 1.7.2?

On the server, I can crawl through the /etc/ssh/sshd_config” file to look for configured parameters (RSAAuthentication yes for example), but that doesn’t tell me what the OpenSSH defaults are, and doesn’t tell me what’s necessarily being asked of OpenSSL either (which might be swallowing the actual error).

Aside/Weirdness: networking

I started to pursue the idea of upgrading OpenSSH, so I ran sudo apt-get update to prepare for updating everything in the VM.  That’s when I noticed I wasn’t getting any network connectivity, as it spat back “Could not resolve ‘'” and “Could not resolve ‘'”.

Vbox Mgr indicates I’m using NAT networking (the default), which has worked for me in the past – and works fine for the same Vagrant box running on my Win10 VirtualBox/Vagrant instance (sudo apt-get update “Fetched 529 kB in 3s (142kB/s)”).  Further, the Ubuntu host for this VM has no problem reaching the network.

So I tried changing to Bridged Adapter in Vbox Manager.  Nope, no difference.  Why does the same Vagrant box work fine under Windows but not under Ubuntu?  Am I cursed?

Back to the root problem

Let me review: I’m having a problem getting Ansible to communicate with the VM over SSH.  So let’s get creative:

  • Can Ansible be coerced into talking to the target without SSH?
  • Can Ansible use password authentication instead of public key authentication for SSH?
  • Can the Ubuntu client be downgraded from 1.7.2 to 1.6.7 openssh-client?

Lightbulb moment

Of course!  The “connection reset by peer” issue isn’t a matter of deep crypto at all – unless I’m misreading this, the fact that the Ubuntu SSH client takes nearly a minute to return the “connection reset” error and the fact that the Debian VM doesn’t seem to have any IP networking ability off the host…adds up to SSH client not even connecting to the VM’s sshd?

Boy do I feel dumb.  This has nothing to do with crypto – it’s simple layer 3 issues.

Reminds me of a lesson I learned 20 years ago, and seem to re-learn every year or three: “When you hear hooves, think horses not zebras.”

Then how do we establish where the problem is – Virtualbox, Ubuntu, Debian or something else?

  • If it’s a problem in the Debian VM, then download a different Vagrant box
  • If it’s a problem in the Virtualbox setting, keep trying different network settings until one breaks through
  • If it’s a problem in the Ubuntu host, look for reasons why there’d be a block between (host to VM or vice-versa)

What other evidence do we have?  Well, when I run vagrant up from the Ubuntu host, it gets to “default: SSH auth method: private key” then eventually reports “Timed out while waiting for the machine to boot.  This means that Vagrant was unable to communicate with the guest machine within the configured (“config.vm.boot_timeout” value) time period.”  Makes me more suspicious of the VM.

Searching the Vagrant boxes registry, mosaicpro/html looks like it’s desktop (not locked-down server) oriented, so I tried that one.  Watched it boot, then report “default: Warning: Remote connection disconnect. Retrying…” over and over for a few minutes.  The console via Vbox Mgr looked like the Ubuntu VM was trying to configure networking (even though DHCP had offered it an address of – which must’ve been the NAT adapter, since my home network runs on 192.168.1/24).  But oddly, networking from within the client was working fine after that – ping out to my home router ( returned fine.  OK, then I’m *definitely* suspecting that Debian/jessie64 (8.6.0) box.

Vagrant/Debian downgrade anyone?

So, after all this, can I download a previous version of the Debian/jessie64 box (e.g. 8.5.2, not this troublesome 8.6.0)?  Let’s try it, using this article as basis.

(I went one step further and ran the initial command as vagrant add debian-8.5.2 – and amazingly, this variation seemed to work!)

And here’s some promising results:

  • lsb_release -a reports the 8.5.2 box as “Debian GNU/Linux 8.5 (jessie)”, vs the 8.6.0 box as “Debian GNU/Linux 8.6 (jessie)”
  • A quick look at the /etc/ssh/sshd_config from the 8.5.2 box shows there is *no* insertion of the PasswordAuthentication configuration parameter (let alone setting it to “no” like in the 8.6.0 box)
  • Network connectivity from the 8.5.2 box to my home router is awesome (vs the 8.6.0 box that can’t seem to ping out of a wet paper bag)

Final Lesson

If you’re a Vagrant + Virtualbox user, stay FAR away from the 8.6.0 version of the debian/jessie64 box (unless you’re prepared to fight with these same issues I have, and probably other ‘security lockdown’ ideas that I haven’t even uncovered yet, but are almost surely there).

Troubleshooting SSH blocker in the Debian/jessie64 Vagrant box

After getting Vagrant and Virtualbox to play nice together, I turned my attention back to testing my Ansible Vault configuration ideas on a Debian8 VM.

Because I’d been having continued problems connecting to the damned box, I init’d a new VM based on debian/jessie64.  Once again, however, I noticed two issues:

  1. Vagrant is no longer registering new VMs in the VirtualBox Manager (when did Vagrant stop doing this?)
  2. I’m unable to copy SSH keys to freshly-booted Debian VM – ssh-copy-id results in this response:
    mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/$ ssh-copy-id vagrant@ -p 2200
    /usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: attempting to log in with the new key(s), to filter out any that are already installed
    /usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: 1 key(s) remain to be installed -- if you are prompted now it is to install the new keys
    Permission denied (publickey).

This article purports to have the answer to this, but even after fixing and re-checking the /etc/ssh/sshd_config multiple times, I’m still getting the same “Permission denied (publickey)” response.

After a couple of hours of tail-chasing, I finally remembered the debug flags in the ssh command (-v and -vvv).  That results in this output:

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/Copy-ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ssh -p 2200 vagrant@ -v
OpenSSH_6.6.1, OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for *
debug1: Connecting to [] port 2200.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/Copy-ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ssh -p 2200 vagrant@ -v
OpenSSH_6.6.1, OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014
debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh/ssh_config
debug1: /etc/ssh/ssh_config line 19: Applying options for *
debug1: Connecting to [] port 2200.
debug1: Connection established.
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_rsa type 1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_rsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_dsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_dsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ecdsa type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ecdsa-cert type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ed25519 type -1
debug1: identity file /home/mike/.ssh/id_ed25519-cert type -1
debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0
debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_6.6.1p1 Ubuntu-2ubuntu2.8
debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_6.7p1 Debian-5+deb8u3
debug1: match: OpenSSH_6.7p1 Debian-5+deb8u3 pat OpenSSH* compat 0x04000000
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
debug1: kex: server->client aes128-ctr none
debug1: kex: client->server aes128-ctr none
debug1: sending SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_INIT
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
debug1: Server host key: ECDSA b0:b7:27:f4:0a:91:a4:37:8c:ce:35:a3:e3:fe:db:2d
debug1: Host '[]:2200' is known and matches the ECDSA host key.
debug1: Found key in /home/mike/.ssh/known_hosts:4
debug1: ssh_ecdsa_verify: signature correct
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/mike/.ssh/id_rsa
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey
debug1: Trying private key: /home/mike/.ssh/id_dsa
debug1: Trying private key: /home/mike/.ssh/id_ecdsa
debug1: Trying private key: /home/mike/.ssh/id_ed25519
debug1: No more authentication methods to try.
Permission denied (publickey).

I tried regenerating keys, but that still ends with the same “Permission denied (publickey)” message.

Is it possible that the Debian box’s sshd isn’t accepting RSA keys for SSH auth?  If that were true, wouldn’t the sshd_config include “RSAAuthentication no” instead of the “RSAAuthentication yes” I’m seeing?

It’s odd – when I attempt to ssh directly, I’m getting this kind of output – this implies that the remote sshd is attempting to accept password for authentication, even though it’s acting like I haven’t typed in the correct password (I am):

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/Copy-ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ssh vagrant@ 2200
vagrant@'s password:
Permission denied, please try again.
vagrant@'s password:
Permission denied, please try again.
vagrant@'s password:
Received disconnect from 14:

Time for a reset.

Solution (?)

Ripped out every VM on my system.  Re-inited.  Edited Vagrantfile.  Tried/failed.  Mounted the machine in the VirtualBox Manager app (because, Vagrant’s still not registering the machine with the Manager UI). Launched the Debian box interactively from VBox Mgr.

Edited the /etc/ssh/sshd_config file to change the PasswordAuthentication setting TWICE.


Something, somewhere, is inserting two entries (one commented out, the other uncommented at the very end of the file) that are both set to “no”.

What.  The.  Heck.

Set them *both* to yes (left them both uncommented, just for show) and rebooted the box.


ssh-copy-id is easily able to authenticate with the vagrant password *and* copy the current RSA public key to the appropriate file:

mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/$ ssh-copy-id vagrant@ -p 2222
The authenticity of host '[]:2222 ([]:2222)' can't be established.
ECDSA key fingerprint is b0:b7:27:f4:0a:91:a4:37:8c:ce:35:a3:e3:fe:db:2d.
Are you sure you want to continue connecting (yes/no)? yes
/usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: attempting to log in with the new key(s), to filter out any that are already installed
/usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: 1 key(s) remain to be installed -- if you are prompted now it is to install the new keys
Permission denied (publickey).
mike@MIKE-WIN10-SSD:~/code/Copy-ansible-role-unattended-upgrades$ ssh-copy-id vagrant@ -p 2222
/usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: attempting to log in with the new key(s), to filter out any that are already installed
/usr/bin/ssh-copy-id: INFO: 1 key(s) remain to be installed -- if you are prompted now it is to install the new keys
vagrant@'s password:

Number of key(s) added: 1

Now try logging into the machine, with: "ssh -p '2222' 'vagrant@'"
and check to make sure that only the key(s) you wanted were added.

Boy, *that’s* going to be fun to remember to do every time I destroy and recreate this VM.

[Oh, and keep this article in your back pocket in case you run into a different SSH troubleshooting issue:]

Troubleshooting E_FAIL SessionMachine between Virtualbox and Vagrant

Today I wanted to dive back into my research on Ansible, so I fired up one of my Debian VMs under Vagrant/Virtualbox.  The VM was an older image (8.5.3) so I updated to the latest (8.6.0), and then found myself troubleshooting weird connectivity issues for hours.

Eventually I got myself to this point, where the VirtualBox Manager wouldn’t even start up the VM:


This error leads to the following article:

The AppCompatFlags entry doesn’t exist, but as for another user, even though VirtualBox Manager reports it’s running the latest version (5.0.26), looking at the Downloads page tells a different story (5.1.6).  Installed that, then of course Vagrant howled loudly:

C:\Users\Mike\VirtualBox VMs\BaseDebianServer>vagrant destroy
The provider 'virtualbox' that was requested to back the machine
'default' is reporting that it isn't usable on this system. The
reason is shown below:

Vagrant has detected that you have a version of VirtualBox installed
that is not supported by this version of Vagrant. Please install one of
the supported versions listed below to use Vagrant:

4.0, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.0

A Vagrant update may also be available that adds support for the version
you specified. Please check to download
the latest version.

C:\Users\Mike\VirtualBox VMs\BaseDebianServer>vagrant -v
Vagrant 1.8.1

There’s a 1.8.5 Vagrant version available, so I installed that too.

There, once again the master and the servant are back in sync:

C:\Users\Mike\VirtualBox VMs\BaseDebianServer>vagrant up
Bringing machine 'default' up with 'virtualbox' provider...
==> default: Importing base box 'debian/jessie64'...
==> default: Matching MAC address for NAT networking...
==> default: Checking if box 'debian/jessie64' is up to date...
==> default: Setting the name of the VM: BaseDebianServer_default_1474924390887_22621
==> default: Clearing any previously set network interfaces...
==> default: Preparing network interfaces based on configuration...
 default: Adapter 1: nat
==> default: Forwarding ports...
 default: 22 (guest) => 2222 (host) (adapter 1)
==> default: Booting VM...
==> default: Waiting for machine to boot. This may take a few minutes...
 default: SSH address:
 default: SSH username: vagrant
 default: SSH auth method: private key
 default: Vagrant insecure key detected. Vagrant will automatically replace
 default: this with a newly generated keypair for better security.
 default: Inserting generated public key within guest...
 default: Removing insecure key from the guest if it's present...
 default: Key inserted! Disconnecting and reconnecting using new SSH key...
==> default: Machine booted and ready!
==> default: Checking for guest additions in VM...
 default: No guest additions were detected on the base box for this VM! Guest
 default: additions are required for forwarded ports, shared folders, host only
 default: networking, and more. If SSH fails on this machine, please install
 default: the guest additions and repackage the box to continue.
 default: This is not an error message; everything may continue to work properly,
 default: in which case you may ignore this message.

<editorial understatement=”on”>Based on the SuperUser question above, I’m guessing this isn’t an uncommon problem as Vagrant and Virtualbox rev their engines.</editorial>

Lean Coffee September insights report

That’s our Sunday morning Lean Coffee practice. Here’s where we landed after a good 1.5-ish hours of structured-and-friendly conversation.

 On the subject of landing a job as a Scrum Master

  • You must be very familiar with the SCRUM Guide, and especially the “Why” behind each practice – so that you can address real questions about when you’ll recommend a practice and when you’ll recommend evolving past it
  • Should be very comfortable with trying new things AS EXPERIMENTS
  • Must avoid “always pitying the SCRUM team” at the expense of the overall business goals, or else business will hamstring your influence and bypass your role
  • Relies heavily on Situational Leadership abilities
  • Starts with CI, graduate to Continuous Learning

On the subject of what’s changed and what is changing

  • According to our discussion of Crossing the Chasm, once those beyond the chasm start adopting, then rather than chasing the downward slope, you should chase a new curve starting from the other side of the chasm
  • We’re seeing signs that other non-software disciplines are adopting Agile practices eg. Marketing functions, DevOps
  • Perhaps we’re merely waiting for the rest of the org to catch up to those of us who are post-Agile and delivering continuously
  • The VUCA model (Volatility, Uncertainty, Complexity, Ambiguity) made it into a Harvard Business Review article
  • Neurodiversity is getting broader consciousness

 On the subject of creating success as a Scrum Master

  • The basic SM is a “boundary manager”
  • They’re there not only to help the team “learn to be a team” and more to help the team “learn how to be Agile as a team”
  • They’re there to work with the team and enable them to determine what process solutions to try, rather than dictate or even “guide” the team to specific outcomes
  • Tip: should be very familiar with the Agile Fluency model
  • When interviewing for a SM role, an insightful question is to ask what are the inputs and outputs of the engineering team?
  • Geoff Watts published an article asking What kind of support a Scrum Master would need?

On the subject of no estimates

  • Analogy of a cook: asking for precise estimates is like asking them to cook a dinner with a menu they’ve never cooked before
  • Analogy of car mechanic: they can only give predictable, tight estimated of when the repair will be completed for operations they’ve already done before (enough time to have codified the standard timeframe) and with mechanics who are highly experienced

Miscellaneous Insights

  • Meetup (as in the collection of fluid communities) is like a grand ongoing Un-Conference – people announcing a topic they’d like to talk about, those who wish to attend come, people obeying the law of two feet as the meetup’s theme no longer keep their attention
  • Check out Rachel Davies’ Agile Coaching book
  • There’s growing insight that SAFe can find better flow mechanics across the portfolio if it uses Kanban rather than SCRUM – but that a prerequisite is that the teams must already have in place high-quality technical practices (eg. low big output, continuous integration, short distance from idea to value) and functioning teams before Kanban at scale will create consistent results
  • Book: check out the free mini-book on Scrumban by Henrik Kniberg

See you there next time (if you’re lucky).

The Yahoo Hack: Protect Yourself, PLEASE


If you have a Yahoo account (you probably do, by these numbers), first go change the identical password on other sites (you probably re-used the password between Yahoo and some other sites)…

AND be prepared to change the answers to (and maybe even questions of, if you often use the same ones) your security questions [the ones used to help you – OR A HACKER – reset a forgotten password] on any sites with answers in common.  Please, these responses that you’ve typed in – if accurate, and used on many sites – are not only a great way for someone who gets your password on one site, to then dig into those answers and reset your password (even one you never used elsewhere) on another site.

Focus first on your primary email address (because that’s often the most valuable – since it’s where all password resets get sent, right?), and then on your financial accounts (even those with two-factor authentication – let’s not let them drain our savings just because we were a bit lazy).

Then consider whether any of your other online accounts have real value to you if you permanently or even temporarily lost control of them. e.g. Twitter/Instagram/Tumblr/Wordpress, if you have a public presence that has helped build your reputation.

Then go get yourself a password manager (see some reviews here and here). I adopted 1Password three years ago (mostly because I prefer good UX over infinite configurability), and now I don’t care how ridiculous my random passwords are, and I intentionally provide random/hilarious (at least to me) misinformation in my security questions (because I just write these misinfos down in my password manager in the Notes field for each site).

Then reset the rest of your passwords on sites where you used the same one as your Yahoo account(s).

Sorry this was so long. But a breach like this hits lots of people and opens them up to a LOT of malicious activity across much of their digital life.  You may not be that attractive a target, but I bet your financial accounts are.

Occupied Neurons, late September edition

Modern Agile (Agile 2016 keynote)

This call out for advancement of Agile beyond 2001 and beyond the fossilization of process and “scale” is refreshing. It resonates with me in ways few other discussions of “is there Agile beyond SCRUM?” have inspired – because it provides an answer upon which we can stand up actual debate, refinement and objective experiments.

While I’m sure there are those who would wish to quibble of perfecting these new principles before committing to their underlying momentum, I for one am happy to accept this as an evolutionary stage beyond Agile Manifesto and use it to further my teams and my own evolution.

Forget Technical Debt – Here’s How to Build Technical Wealth

I had the pleasure of meeting and talking with (mostly listening and learning intently on my part) Andrea Goulet at .NET Fringe 2016 conference. Andrea is a refreshing leader in software development because she leads not only through craftsmanship but also communication as key tenet of success with her customers.

Andrea advances the term “software remodelling” to properly focus the work that deals with Technical Debt. Rather than approach the TD as a failing, looking at it “as a natural outgrowth of occupying and using the software” draws heavily and well on the analogy of remodelling your/a home.

Frequent Password Changes Are The Enemy of Security

After a decade or more of participating in the constant ground battle of information security, it became clear to me that the threat models and state of the art in information warfare has changed drastically; the defenses have been slow to catch up.

One of the vestigial tails of 20th-century information security is the dogmatically-proscribed “scheduled password change”.

The idea back then was that we had so few ways of knowing whether someone was exploiting an active, privileged user account, and we only had single-factor (password) authentication as a means of protecting that digital privilege on a system, that it seemed reasonable to force everyone to change passwords on a frequent, scheduled basis. So that, if an attacker somehow found your password (such as on a sticky note by your keyboard), *eventually* they would lose such access because they wouldn’t know your new password.

So many problems with this – for example:

  • Password increments – so many of us with multiple frequently-rotating passwords just tack on an increment img number to the end of the last password when forced to change – not terribly secure, but the only tolerable defense when forced to deal with this unnecessary burden
  • APTs and password databases – most password theft these days don’t come from random guessing, it comes from hackers either getting access to the entire database at the server, or persistent malware on your computer/phone/tablet or public devices like wifi hardware that MITM’s your password as you send it to the server
  • Malware re-infections – changing your password is only good if it isn’t as easy to steal it *after* the change as it was *before* the change – not a lot of point in changing passwords when you can get attacked just as easily (and attackers are always coming up with new zero-days to get you)

I was one of the evil dudes who reflexively recommended this measure to every organization everywhere. I apologize for perpetuating this mythology.